The Dornan File
By: Ryan Young
It seems like our poor government just can’t get anything
right. That is the public perception again this week after Cathy Bennett announced
that the services of communications consultant Cathy Dornan will no longer be
retained. This comes as a bit of a surprise since Premier Ball has continually defended
the hiring of external consultants for labour negotiations on the merit that it is
something that has been done before.
It was back in April that the government announced that it
was retaining the services of law firm Mcinnes Cooper to assist with labour
negotiations, at a rate of $350 per hour. Dornan, an independent communications
and crisis management consultant, was hired in turn by Mcinnes Cooper to
provide strategic communications advice for those negotiations. There were a few
eye rolls, but surprisingly very little scrutiny of Dornan’s Liberal ties.
Dornan was Director of Communications in the premier’s office under Brian Tobin
and her husband was Chief of Staff under Roger Grimes and was a key member of
Cathy Bennett’s bid for the Liberal leadership in 2013. If none of that strikes
you as particularly odd, it is worth noting that the Liberal Party threw Robert
Dornan under the bus over comments made to Fred Hutton of VOCM regarding
scheduling of debates during the election campaign last fall. In some circles
on social media it has been suggested that the Dornan’s are still very close
with the Liberals and the labor negotiations were a great place for the party
to start making amends for their earlier actions against Mr. Dornan. Such
allegations are, of course, nothing but wild speculation from an angry public at
large, but you have to admit that the Liberals have been great at adding fuel
to that particular fire.
The government maintained that the external expertise was
needed, but after negotiating deadlines with the largest unions were missed,
and there was apparently no communication happening between the government and
the unions, people began to ask questions about the validity of the work being
done. Crony consultants hired on the public dime are nothing new in this
province, but when you consider that we paid Dornan over $20,000 last month for
her services and the total bill to Mcinnes Cooper is now over $100,000, we have
to wonder where do we draw the line?
In a statement issued to the press on Wednesday, Finance
Minister Cathy Bennett said that the government has advised Mcinnes Cooper that external
communications resources would no longer be required and that they will now be
handling all of their communications in-house. NAPE President Jerry Earle
insists that with over 40 lawyers already on the government payroll, there is
no need for the hiring of any external legal staff to assist with negotiations.
According to Earle, over $100,000 of public money has been spent on these
external consultants and no negotiations or communications have taken place.
Just where has all that money gone?
For a government that is desperately trying to save face and
repair its image, you have to wonder who is making these key decisions. Getting
cozy with Mcinnes Cooper may seem like an innocent relationship to the
government, but when you factor in John Greene’s recent departure from the firm to head up the Nalcor board, in addition to the non-existent labor
negotiations and Dornan’s obvious political ties, the whole thing just reeks of
patronage and cronyism, the very things that the Liberals campaigned on
reforming just last fall. I have no doubt that Mcinnes Cooper is a credible and
honorable firm that does good work, but in politics image is everything and
this story just perpetuates the negative, business-as-usual image that this government has created for
itself in a very short time.
Sadly for Ball and Bennett, while letting Dornan go was the
right move, the government again left themselves with no way to look good in
the public eye. If they had kept Dornan on, despite the lack of anything to
show for her billing charges, people would be angry. Now by letting her go,
the government is admitting that they made another mistake, adding to the
perception that they are not capable of making sound financial decisions. This
government desperately needs someone to make some good choices and then
effectively communicate it to the public. The PC’s were notoriously bad
communicators, and this new government has retained all of the same staff that
were responsible for the lack of credible dialogue between government and the
public during their tenure. In the face of the scope of the communications
breakdowns that we have witnessed since the Liberal’s came to power, it is
baffling to why there has not been a major shakeup in communications at the
top.
To anyone who has watched Seinfeld, you may find yourself
wondering if Dornan was hired to work on the Penske File. $20,000 for missing deadlines
and failing to communicate seems like a pretty sweet payday, even by government
standards. Unfortunately, the people of this province are the ones again left wondering
if we will ever have a government that truly works in the best interest of our
people instead of their people.
Dump a hundred grand to your Buddies?? ... WHILE you cut medical tests?? ... and take away the only nurse for a community?? ... and pile multiple grades of (our) children in the one classroom?? ... AND close Libraries??
ReplyDeleteThese actions sure seem like psychopathic behaviour to me.... here are some traits of psychopaths from a renowned expert: CONNING AND MANIPULATIVENESS — The use of deceit and deception to cheat, con, or defraud others for personal gain; distinguished from Item #4 in the degree to which exploitation and callous ruthlessness is present, as reflected in a lack of concern for the feelings and suffering of one’s victims.
LACK OF REMORSE OR GUILT — A lack of feelings or concern for the losses, pain, and suffering of victims; a tendency to be unconcerned, dispassionate, cold-hearted, and non-empathic. This item is usually demonstrated by a disdain for one’s victims.
SHALLOW AFFECT — Emotional poverty or a limited range or depth of feelings; interpersonal coldness in spite of signs of open gregariousness.
CALLOUSNESS and LACK OF EMPATHY — A lack of feelings toward people in general; cold, contemptuous, inconsiderate, and tactless. Here's the link: http://www.sociopathicstyle.com/psychopathic-traits/ .... there are tests that reveal if a person has psychopathic tendencies. I think all top level Exec.s and MHA's (and new candidates) should be tested prior to taking office. Otherwise we're finished (yet again).
P. Austin, Father and concerned citizen.
And apparently they can do as they please and there's NOTHING we can legally do to stop them.
ReplyDelete