The Strange and Sad Story of Beatrice Hunter
By: Ryan Young
Like many people across Newfoundland and Labrador, I have
been following Beatrice Hunter’s story very closely over the last two weeks.
For those who may not be aware, Beatrice Hunter is an Inuk grandmother and Land
Protector who is presently being held in custody at the penitentiary in St.
John’s for refusing to stay away from the Muskrat Falls site.
On May 29th, during a court hearing for
Protectors who broke an injunction to stay away from the Muskrat Falls site
during Victoria Day Weekend, Judge George Murphy asked Hunter if she would
promise to stay away from the protest site. Hunter told the judge she could not
make that promise and as a result she was remanded into custody.
The story took another turn on June 2nd when it
was learned that Hunter had been transferred to Her Majesty’s Penitentiary in
St. John’s. Since then, there has been a large public outcry at Hunter’s
incarceration, including protests at Nalcor headquarters and outside of HMP. In
Labrador, fellow Protectors have held vigils and rallied for Beatrice’s
release, and there is a large rally planned for Thursday at Colonial Building
in St. John’s.
For the government, this has become another case of very bad
optics. While most people seem to agree that they should not interfere with the
judicial system, the fact that the injunction itself came from Nalcor makes the
government responsible for Beatrice Hunter’s incarceration. They had they
option of telling Nalcor to back off from the charges against the Protectors
but chose not to do so. Now, with Hunter’s defiance, they have painted
themselves into a corner that can have no positive political outcome.
I don’t think that Hunter intentionally tried to make a
martyr of herself, but in many ways, she has become one. Many people across the
province were upset with the treatment of the Land Protectors who were charged
for standing up against Nalcor, and when Hunter was transferred to HMP, the
cries of colonialism out of Labrador began to grow in volume and urgency. When
our justice system takes an indigenous grandmother away from her family and her
home for exercising her rights to protest, it leaves many wondering just what
our priorities are.
Despite the many socio-political issues at play, we can’t ignore
the fact that Beatrice did break the law. No matter how much we may not like
the law sometimes, we can’t blame those whose job it is to enforce it. She left
the judge little choice when she refused to stay away from the site, and under
the law he felt compelled to do something. What that something was, however, is the issue at hand.The discussion should not be whether
or not Beatrice should be punished under the law, it should be whether or not
the punishment fits the crime. Hunter is a law-abiding citizen who has never
been in trouble with the courts before and her only crime was protesting what
she believed to be an injustice against her people. It does not seem
unreasonable to think that there could have been another solution that could
have been explored instead of sending this grandmother to the pen.
The whole situation is very, very sticky. In addition to
Beatrice’s direct story, it also touches on issues of overcrowding in our
prisons and the differential treatment of protesters on the island vs those in
Labrador. I understand the importance of not having the government interfere
with the justice system, but at this point it seems inevitable that they will
have to act in some capacity. Hunter is due back in court on Friday and if she
continues to be held at HMP, the disgruntled murmur from the public will soon
turn into an angry roar. There are options, and Andrew Parson’s should be
exploring every possibility of how to get Beatrice home. Considering all the
talk about truth and reconciliation in this country, we need our leaders to
take a stand and ensure that we are doing everything we can to protect the
rights of aboriginal women.
In a video released by CBC on June 6th from
inside HMP, Hunter expressed the major frustration that she and many other Land
Protectors have with Nalcor. A lack of answers to their questions. This
highlights the larger issue of the lack of openness and accountability when it
comes to the Muskrat Falls project. Despite promising to open the project up to
public scrutiny, the Liberal’s have become even more secretive than the previous
administration was and are refusing to release any reports from the oversight
committee. The message being sent by government via Nalcor to the people of
Labrador is don’t ask questions and don’t try to get in our way or you will end
up in jail. I don’t think they were betting on the defiance of someone like
Beatrice Hunter to turn public opinion against them.
No matter how this story turns out, irreparable damage has already been done to an already strained relationship
between the government and the people of Labrador. The Smallwoodian “develop or
perish” attitude seems to be alive and well with the current incarnation of
Liberal leaders, and the steamrolling of the Muskrat Falls project without the
support of the people living in Labrador will not soon be forgotten. The
intimidation of Nalcor will always be seen as the strong arm of government
against the people living downstream of mighty Muskrat and the dam will
continue to enforce the idea of colonialism that is spreading through the big
land like wildfire. There is no political value in having Beatrice Hunter
locked up, and the first thing this government needs to do to start repairing
the rift is to send her home. The second thing they need to do is start
listening to people like Beatrice and start giving them the answers they have been demanding. That doesn't seem like too much to ask for...
No comments:
Post a Comment